Donald Trump has come close to suggesting the US might unilaterally withdraw from Nato if other member states fail to dramatically increase their spending on the military bloc.
At an emergency press conference later, Trump appeared to row back from this threat, claiming Nato members had agreed to commit an extra $33bn (£25bn). He said it had been “a little tough for a little while” and he had told the Europeans he would be “very unhappy” if they did not up their spending “substantially”.
But he said a “tremendous amount of progress” had been made. Nato was now “much stronger”, he added, with spending “rocketing” upwards.
Could Trump withdraw the US from Nato?
Trump appeared to suggest he had the power to withdraw the US from Nato without the approval of the US Congress.
In fact, the organisation was established by a formal and binding treaty, which means Trump cannot use his executive power to pull America out of the alliance, in contrast to other international agreements such as the Iran nuclear deal or the Paris climate agreement, both of which Trump has withdrawn from.
Can Nato members meet Trump’s 4% defence spending target?
Donald Trump left the opening day of the Nato summit in Brussels in disarray on Wednesday after making a surprise demand for members to raise their defence spending to 4% of GDP.
Is the 4% target realistic?
The existing funding target – 2% of GDP – is only being met or exceeded by five of Nato’s 29 countries, according to newly published figures. They are: the US on 3.6%, Greece on 2.2%, Estonia 2.14%, the UK 2.10%, and Poland on 2%. France currently spends 1.8% and Germany 1.2%.
The escalating costs of defence are well known. To build an aircraft carrier, a 21st century fighter jet or a cyber unit capable of defeating Russian attacks is rising at a rate much faster than average inflation.
British defence secretary Gavin Williamson has identified a £20bn shortfall in funding over the next 10 years. Without that money, he will need to make further cuts in annual running costs. President Emmanuel Macron, who lopped €650m off the French defence budget last year and sacked his military chief for complaining about it, has promised to boost spending to 2% by 2025, five years earlier than Germany.
Where would the money come from?
Britain and France have global ambitions, but run budget deficits. That means any extra spending must come from extra borrowing, higher taxes or cuts to other departments.
As Trump has pointed out, Germany currently runs a budget surplus and could increase its defence spending to 2% – but doubling it to 4% would be a very long shot.
Trump would normally first need to win approval in the Senate and to persuade Republican senators that the move is necessary and in the US’s long-term security interests.
Unsurprisingly, Trump’s apparent threat caused dismay on Thursday among European allies. There is no certainty it would attract support in Washington from leading Republicans.
What would the consequences be?
Leaving Nato would be a seismic step, previously unthinkable, that would shake up a western alliance that has endured for more than 70 years. It would also be a boon to Russia and its leader, Vladimir Putin, whom Trump will meet on Monday in Helsinki.
Ultimately, a decision by the White House to abandon Nato could be challenged legally and end up in the US supreme court. Trump now has a majority in the court and is likely to succeed in winning approval for his conservative nominee, Brett Kavanaugh.
For now it appears that Trump’s threat is just that. In more emollient tones, Trump claimed on Thursday that the US’s commitment to Nato was “very strong and “remains very strong” following negotiations.
Jens Stoltenberg, the Nato secretary general, is now left with a headache: what to do if Trump returns to this theme of departure and how might the alliance survive were America really to leave?