Engineers in Morocco are preparing to test Africa’s first high-speed railway this week with trains reaching 320kilometres (200 miles) per hour, the country’s rail office said Monday.
One train reached 275kph (170 mph) on Monday along a stretch of track between the northern cities of Kenitra and Tangier, the ONCF said.
‘This is already the fastest train on the African continent,’ said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, who was in Morocco to sign a loan deal between the ONCF and the French Development Agency.
A locomotive for Morocco’s first high speed rail link, produced by French train maker Alstom, arrives at the Moroccan port of Tangier on June 30, 2015
He said the railway was ’emblematic of the Franco-Moroccan bilateral relationship‘.
The link between Casablanca and Tangier via the capital Rabat will slash journey times between the North African country’s economic hubs by almost two thirds, from five hours and 45 minutes to just over two hours.
Morocco’s TGV, which gets its name from the French abbreviation for high-speed trains, is set to enter service in summer 2018.
The total cost of the project, 50 per cent financed by France through various loans, is around $2.4billion (two billion euros).
Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita (right) and his French counterpart Jean-Yves Le Drian in Rabat on October 9
It is set to go around 15 per cent over budget, according to figures released on Monday.
But ONCF head Rabii Lakhlii said the project had cost ‘less than nine million euros per kilometre, compared to a European standard of 20 million euros per kilometre’.
The route, made more complex by hilly terrain and strong winds, required the building of several viaducts including one some 3.5 kilometres long.
The ONCF is targeting six million travellers a year after three years of operations.
Lakhlii said tickets would cost about 30 per cent more than those for the current rail link.
Moroccan leaders have heralded the project as a key step in modernising the country’s infrastructure.
But opponents have criticised it, saying the money could have been better spent in a country where many live in poverty.
They also argue that it unfairly favoured French companies.
